|
What has changed is so far only an expression.
In our introduction
we have made the basic assumption that
curved space is in reality contracted space,
the opposite of expanded space.
Assuming this will give us an interesting main
thread. This
article will try to follow this main
thread to see where it
brings us.
Even if the expression: "Matter Contracts Space" seems
to be close to the well-known: "Curvature of Space",
this article will show that such simple changes are merely
in expression. In reality this theory opens, not some, but
all the doors to fully understanding the cause of gravity
and more.
Well, this “immediately” sounds too good to be true. But think
about attempting to solve one mystery. Most likely some of
your findings will contradict other information. That "Matter
contracts space" seems to solve 10 to 12 huge mysteries and
is met with little by way of contradiction or opposition.
Even further,
"Matter
contracts space"
leads us to a more
complete understanding of existing theories.
This assumption
will quickly lead to the conclusion that
our
understanding of central gravity has been based in part
on a serious
misunderstanding;
For the last
300 years we have accepted
that our knowledge about how
two or several fields
of gravity
affect (and counteract)
each other was correct (and it is), and that this
expression of
a law of gravity should be used to
understand how one single field of gravity
centrally cancels itself out component wise, (but this is wrong).
*
* *
When we draw
a comparison between Einstein’s and Newton’s claim; there need not be any
disagreement between the discoveries of these two great thinkers. The claim of
Isaac Newton that ‘there is a force of attraction between bodies’ could
just as well be the force which is responsible for the curving of space.
The curvature
of space leads us to think that there may be some link between matter and
space. Put simply, this is because space curves are proportional to the
amount of matter in a gravitational field. Even though we cannot see space it
must somehow be linked or connected to matter.
We also know
that space (and energy) somehow created matter.
Either space
and matter were divided after the creation of matter or; there always has
been a connection between space and matter, and space and matter have a
continuous, exchangeable co-existence with each other.
The main
thread
of this article is; does space 'contracts' have the exactly same meaning as
space 'curves'. In looking into this it leads us to ask questions about
gravity. The currently accepted understanding of what space is, is suitable
purely for mathematical/geometric purposes. The new expression is more suitable
for our mind.
A large part of
this theory doesn't need to be proven as it follows from the work of Albert
Einstein and Sir Isaac Newton.
It is essential
we understand that ‘space curves’, ‘space deforms’, and ‘space time’ are all
expressions of the same phenomena. Nothing should stop us from adding ‘space
contracts’.
Understanding
space in a contraction framework sets us to better understand what happens to
space in the presence of matter.
The question of
how matter causes space to curve, deform, or contract will remain the same.
The chapter
'quantum physics' will give a good suggestion as to how this might be possible.
There it will be shown that a force driven by the spin of elementary particles
can be responsible for spinning space together until it contracts and curves.
So far this
sounds pretty simplistic, but it also seems quite possible that Isaac Newton made a
big mistake a long time ago that neither Einstein, nor anybody else discovered. This mistake that has prevented us from better understanding central
gravity. In the next chapter "Dark Matter" we will uncover what went wrong 300
years ago.
This theory can
also easily show how to unite the 4 force of nature as well as uniting relativity theory
with quantum physics.
| 
