.

We don't know really what mass attraction is.  According to this theory it is "lack of space density" - which mean a; "space-density-vacuum".  When two astronomic objects absorbs space from the area between each other, space in that area will attract the objects, simply because the planets attacks the space density.  We can say that that tension of space in that areas occurs,  and this is what we in centuries have expressed as "a gravitational attraction force".

Between the bearing and the object A and B, there is a force. We have no evidence that "mass-attraction-connections" not can transmit kinetic energy between each other.  Any other known force would transfer kinetic orbit energy to the bearings rotation. If any resistance in the bearing more energy can be transmitted and converted. There is no reason to believe that the same principle also not should apply between astronomic objects.

The mass attraction connection is working both way. We will refer to both these with the expression; SpaceWind (SW) - (It's not a perfect expression but the best so far.) 

On the one hand; a orbiting planet is able to "pull" the rotation of a star, and hence increase or maintain the stars rotation against the opposite force;  relativistic resistance (RR).

This is only possible when the angular velocity of the orbiting object is faster as the rotation of the rotating object.

In this case the orbiting object will slowly lose Kinetic Energy (KE) and sooner or later "fall down" and collide with the rotating object.

On the other hand, when the angular speed of a orbiting objects (for example a planet orbiting a star) is slower as for example the rotation of the star, the result is opposite. In that case the star will either force the planet further away or maintain the rotation of the star (against relativistic resistance) .  

In that case the rotating object will slowly lose kinetic energy. When all rotating objects finally is lost, the rotating objects will slowly stop its rotation.

This is already well supported (the cause of accelerating space probes and that planet didn't fall to the new born Sun in a protoplanetary disk) here and here

This mean the rotation at the surface (by the equator) of the Earth after 100.000 years is 1014 meter slower per 24 hour than today.

Due to the direct influence of RR the Earth rotation is losing 7.61*10^-13 meter per second.  After 100.000 years this is only 2.4 meter slower after 100,000 years (per 24 hours).

Due to indirect influence the Earth kinetic rotation energy of the Earth is also lost due to kinetic energy transfer used to push the moon further away from the Earth and to counteract the influence of RR of the Moons orbit velocity. 

Based on the calculation here we see that the indirect KE-lost (to maintain  the moon against RR ) we can see that this is only about 20 % of the direct KE lost.

So we are speaking about that only a very tiny part of the tidal effect must be caused by a additional reason.

The Earth should not rotate so fast as it does, because the angular orbit speed of our Moon is relative slow, so our Moon cannot explain the fast rotation of the Earth. 

This theory claims that the Earth recently had 2 moons (like Mars) one of these was fast. Because of lost of kinetic energy (due to RR) it was smashing into the Earth. The lost of that moon was probably the cause of 90% of all live on earth was eliminated for 65 million years ago. - It was probably not a meteor but a moon that was smashing into the Earth.

The small moon of Mars; Phobos pulls the rotation of Mars, but it is not enough to counteract the rotation-RR (or tidal force). Hence Mars is also slowing it's rotation speed.

Also Mars could million of years ago had have a small moon that collided with Mars long ago.  Probably many million years ago, or even billion years ago. The surface of Mars is many places very suddenly different large area have very few meteor craters..

Calculation of kinetic energy here here.

Recently Saturn have lost a moon, this is why it now is rotating relative fast as well as losing rotation speed. But 6 minutes lost within only 23 years is really a lot. More here.

How did it happen?
Well , when a fast Moon orbit Saturn with a angular speed faster as Saturn’s own rotation), it will increase Saturn rotation speed.

The increasing rotation speed will continue so long the mass-attraction-connection allows to transmit part of the moons own orbit speed / energy (KE) to Saturn’s rotation speed.

But because Saturn is a gas planet such moon will cause Saturn’s inner solid core to rotate faster as the surrounding gas atmosphere. This is because speed of the rotation only can continue until Relativistic Resistance (RR) set the limit.

Because the circumstance gets larger the further away the planet we get, the speed of the atmosphere must travel faster and faster if the rotation everywhere should be “geostationary” . Such rotation is therefore not possible, simple because RR will not allow it.

Instead RR is causing the inner core and the gas atmosphere to travel with the same speed, which mean that the inner core completes 1 orbit faster than the atmosphere.
Probably the inner core is / was completing 1 orbit 2-3 or maybe 4 times faster than the surface of the gas planet we see.

Therefore this theory predicts that the angular speed of all cores of gas planet is (can be) much faster as the angular speed of the atmosphere.
The angular speed of the atmosphere is larger and larger the deeper we get into the atmosphere.

So soon the moon that once was pulling Saturn’s rotation was lost, the opposite begins to happen.

Saturn’s atmosphere is seen from the core retrograde; - the higher speed of the core will after lost of the important moon, begin to give of much its kinetic energy, - to the atmosphere, - because of gravitational attraction between the atmosphere and the inner (faster) core.

Notice that the measurement of the 6 minutes lost of rotation-speed is measured at Saturn’s magnetic field.

The very rapid lose of rotation speed must mean that Saturn have lost a Moon very recently. Maybe in this century.

The Rotation of Mercury is well understood. But we also have to add the influence of RR and SW and the influence that also all planets affects each other rotation. But the main reason for the rotation of Mercury is probably the orthodox prevailing understanding here 

Jupiter's rotation is also gradually slowing down due to the the tidal drag of the large Galilean moons, and these tidal forces are also gradually causing the moons' orbits to move farther away from the planet. 

But as described above not only the tidal is responsible. Jupiter have only 2 very small moons with a angular speed faster as the planet rotation speed. These 2 small moons are certainly not enough to counteract the direct and indirect influence of RR.

The reason why Jupiter not is losing rotation speed so rapid as Saturn is most likely that it is longer time ago since Jupiter lost a fast moon.  Hence the planet have had time to balance the inner core and outer atmosphere speed.