| |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
Before reading this
chapter please read these two pages
here and
here.
|
 |
A star must rotate to keep
the planets in orbits. |
|
 |
Rotation of stars and planet will gradually
slow down, because
in the end the rotation of astronomic
bodies "pays" all the lost
of KE due to
both RR
against own rotation, and
due to
RR
against planet velocity. |
|
1 |
|
 |
If the transfer of rotation energy
(Space-Wind) (SW),
of a star, - and
the
RR
against planet motion, - both has the same
magnitude the orbits of the
planet's are stable. |
|
1 |
|
 |
When huge planet's
approaching their mother
stars due to the
tidal
force,
and due to
RR the star
gains KE from a such planet
and
increases it's rotation
velocity. This
will force other planets
that not are bound by tby
the tidal force further out of
the solar system further
away from the star.
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
 |
Stars are slowly losing
KE due to
RR
against rotation, and due to
SW
transfer to planets.
Therefore it will
slow down it's rotation. Once
again a huge (or small) planet can be
dragged towards the star due
to the
tidal force and
RR
and
the
process, - of losing a
planet, - repeat it
self. |
|
|
|
|
The principle explained above can clearly bee
seen taking place in many solar systems.
|
|
Solar
Systems |
|
|
Our Solar
System |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1 |
Mass : Kg |
2 * 1030 |
|
Circumference |
4396000000 |
Age |
4.5 Gyr |
|
Surface Velocity |
1483
m/s |
Distance LY |
0 |
|
Average
Rotation Velocity |
815
m/s |
Rotation days |
34.3 |
|
Resistance
|
3.69 * 10-12 |
Radius m 1R |
1 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
6.64
* 1035 |
Rotation s. |
2963520 |
|
Planets |
|
Planet |
Velocity |
Mass |
Kinetic
resistance |
* mc2 (J) |
|
Mercury |
47.890 |
0,33 * 1024 |
1.27 * 10-8
m/s2 |
3.77 * 1032 |
|
Venus |
35.030
|
4,87 * 1024 |
6.81 * 10-9
m/s2 |
2.98 * 1033 |
|
Earth |
29.790 |
5.97 * 1024 |
4.93 * 10-9
m/s2 |
2.65* 1033 |
|
Mars |
24.130
|
0.642 * 1024 |
3.24 * 10-9
m/s2 |
1.87 * 1032 |
|
Jupiter |
13.060
|
1900 * 1024 |
9.48 * 10-10
m/s2 |
1.62 * 1035 |
|
Saturn |
9.640
|
569 * 1024 |
5.16 * 10-10
m/s2 |
2.64 * 1034 |
|
Uranus |
6.810 |
86,8 * 1024 |
2.68 * 10-10
m/s2 |
2.09 * 1033 |
|
Neptune |
5.430 |
102 * 1024 |
1.63 * 10-10
m/s2 |
1,5 * 1033 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
4.78
* 1035 |
|
HD
164922 |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
0.94
|
Mass : Kg |
1.88 * 1030 |
|
Circumference |
3956400000 m. |
Age |
13.4 Gyr |
|
Surface Velocity |
780 m/s |
Distance LY |
|
|
Average
Rotation Velocity |
429
m/s |
Rotation days |
58.7 days |
|
Resistance
|
1.02
* 10-12 m/s |
Radius m 1R |
0.90 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
1.72
* 1035 |
Rotation s. |
5071680 |
|
Planets |
b |
|
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
1155 |
|
Second (1 orbit)..(m) |
99792000 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
3.16 * 1011 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
114.4188 |
|
Velocity |
19.920 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
2.20 * 10-9 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
1.35
*
1035
|
|
Planet-b is probably the last
planet left in this solar system
HD 16922,
all other are already lost. |
|
HD
74156 |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1.24 (E30) |
Mass : Kg |
2,48 * 1030 |
|
Radius m 1R |
1.58 |
Age |
7.38 Gyr |
|
Circumference |
6945680000 m |
Distance LY |
210.6 |
|
Surface Velocity |
4026
m/s |
Rotation days |
19,95 days |
|
Average Rotation Velocity
|
2214
m/s |
Rotation km/s |
4.02 km/s
|
|
Resistance
|
2.73 * 10-11 m/s |
Rotation s. |
1723680 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
6.07
*
1036 |
|
|
|
Planets |
b |
c |
d |
|
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
51.65 |
2476 |
336.6 |
|
Second (1 orbit)..(m) |
4462560 |
213926400 |
29082240 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
4.37 * 1010 |
5.76 * 1011 |
1.53 * 1011 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
597.5204 |
2552.1749 |
125.86068 |
|
Velocity |
56.345 |
15.519 |
30.112 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
1.76 *-108 |
1.34 *-109 |
5.03 *-109 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
5.65* 1036 |
1.84* 1036 |
3.40* 1035 |
|
Total
Resistance
(J) |
7.83
* 1036 |
|
The relative fast rotation of the
star reveals that a planet recently
have been lost.
Planets-b is the next to be
sacrificed.
|
|
HD
11506 |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1.19
|
Mass : Kg |
2,38 * 1030 |
|
Radius m 1R |
1.38 |
Age |
5.4 (± 1.6) Gyr |
|
Circumference
(m) |
6066480000 |
Distance LY |
176.0 |
|
Surface Velocity (m) |
2670
m/s |
Rotation days |
26.3 days |
|
Average Rotation Velocity (m) |
1468
m/s |
Rotation km/s |
|
|
Resistance
|
1.20
* 10-11 m/s |
Rotation s. |
2272320 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
2.57 *
1036 |
|
|
|
Planets |
b |
c |
|
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
1270 |
170.46 |
|
Second (1 orbit)..(m) |
109728000 |
14727744 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
3.65 * 1011 |
9.56* 1010 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
1093.3352 |
260.6206 |
|
Velocity |
20.854 |
40.750 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
2.41 *10-9 |
9.23 *
10-9 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
1.42 * 1036 |
1.29 *
1036 |
|
Total
Resistance
(J) |
2.61
* 1036 |
|
The solar system
HD 11506
is similar to HD
74156.
Several planets have certainly
already been lost.
|
|
Mu
Arae (HD 160691) |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1.10 |
Mass : (Kg) |
2.2 * 1030 |
|
Radius m 1R |
1.36 |
Age
(Gyr ) |
6.34 |
|
Circumference |
5978560000 |
Rotation days |
31 days |
|
Surface Velocity |
2232
m/s |
Distance LY |
50.6 |
|
Average Rotation Velocity (m) |
1227
m/s |
Rotation km/s |
|
|
Resistance
|
8,37
* 10-12
|
Rotation s. |
2678400 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
1.66
*
1036 |
|
|
|
Planets |
b |
c |
d |
f |
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
643.25 |
9.6386 |
310.55 |
4205.8 |
|
Second (1 orbit)..(m) |
55576800 |
832619.52 |
26831520 |
363381120 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
2.25 * 1011 |
1.37 * 1010 |
1.39 * 1011 |
7.89 * 1011 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
532.68308 |
10.5551343 |
165.875477 |
576.54362 |
|
Velocity |
25.538 |
103.493 |
32.491 |
13.637 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
3,63 *10-9 |
5.96 *
10-8 |
5.87 *10-9 |
1,03 *10-9 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
1.03 * 1036 |
3.38 *
1035 |
5.23 *
1035 |
3.19 *
1035 |
|
Total
Resistance
(J) |
2.21 * 1036 |
|
The solar system
HD 160691
is also similar to
HD 74156
and HD
74156.
The solar system has certainly
lost several planets in the past.
|
|
HD 102272 |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1.9 |
Mass : Kg |
3,8 * 1030 |
|
Radius m 1R |
10.1 |
Distance LY |
|
|
Circumference |
44399600000 |
Rotation days |
170 days |
|
Surface Velocity |
3022
m/s |
Rotation km/s |
|
|
Average
Rotation Velocity |
1667
m/s |
Rotation s. |
14688000 |
|
Resistance
|
1.54 * 10-11
|
Age (Gyr ) |
0.70 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
5.27 *
1036 |
|
|
|
Planets |
b |
c |
|
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
127.58 |
520 |
|
Second (1 orbit)..(m) |
11022912 |
44928000 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
9.20 * 1010 |
2.35 * 1011 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
1875.197 |
826.358 |
|
Velocity |
52.488 |
32.841 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
1.0 *10-8 |
5.99 * 10-9 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
1 * 1037 |
2.66 *
1036 |
|
Total
Resistance
(J) |
1.27 *
1037 |
|
HD 102272
is rotating 1 time per 170 days.
This is off course apparently not
much compared to our Sun. We
therefore should expect that the
planets fast would approach that
star and hence already were
demised. But notice that this stars
has a diameter 10 times that of our
Sun's. Hence matter also moves 10
times faster compared to our sun.
So even though the rotation is 5
times slower compared to our sun,
the real (average) mass rotation of
HD 102272 is really double so fast
than the mass rotation from our sun.
And so is the space wind. Hence the
statement mention below really
doesn't sounds strange.
In the article
here
we can red, quote:
When red-giant stars expand, they
tend to eat up the nearby planets,
said Wolszczan.
Although the planet we discovered
conceivably could be closer to the
star without being harmed by it,
there appears to be a zone of
avoidance around such stars of about
0.6 astronomical units, which is a
little more than half of the
distance from the Earth to the Sun,
he added.
|
|
WASP-18 |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1.25 |
Mass : Kg |
2.5 * 1030 |
|
Radius m 1R |
1.216 |
Distance LY |
|
|
Circumference |
4930553000 |
Rotation days |
5.6
days |
|
Surface Velocity |
11048
m/s |
Rotation km/s |
|
|
Average
Rotation Velocity |
6076
m/s |
Rotation s. |
483840 |
|
Resistance
|
2.05 * 10-10
|
Age |
0.63 Gyr |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
4.63
*
1037 |
|
|
|
Planets |
b |
 |
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
0.94145299 |
|
Second (1 orbit)..(m) |
81216 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
3,03 * 109 |
|
Mass - 10.3 * (1.9
* 1027) |
1.95 * 1028 |
|
Velocity |
234591 m/s |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
3.06 *10-7 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
5.37 * 1038 |
|
In the system
WASP-18
a planet is struggling for
surveying. The cause of that
WASP-18b not has demised long
ago, is that this planet
probably have been thrown fare
out in the solar system and back
gain. This could had happen
several times. Each time a heavy
planets are lost, all other
planet is thrown further out in
space due to the increasing star
rotation. .
When a solar system is born,
several huge planets are
demising. This speeds up the
stars rotation velocity allowing
many other planets to escape
fare out in orbit further away.
The next two solar systems show
how this is possible and how it
is possible for planets again to
return to the star. |
|
HD
74156 |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1.24 (E30) |
Mass : Kg |
2,48 * 1030 |
|
Radius m 1R |
1.58 |
Age |
7.38 Gyr |
|
Circumference |
6945680000 m |
Distance LY |
210.6 |
|
Surface Velocity |
4026
m/s |
Rotation days |
19,95 days |
|
Average Rotation Velocity
|
2214
m/s |
Rotation km/s |
4.02 km/s
|
|
Resistance
|
2.73 * 10-11 m/s |
Rotation s. |
1723680 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
6.07
*
1036 |
|
|
|
Planets |
b |
c |
d |
|
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
51.65 |
2476 |
336.6 |
|
Second (1 orbit)..(m) |
4462560 |
213926400 |
29082240 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
4.37 * 1010 |
5.76 * 1011 |
1.53 * 1011 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
597.5204 |
2552.1749 |
125.86068 |
|
Velocity |
56.345 |
15.519 |
30.112 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
1.76 *-108 |
1.34 *-109 |
5.03 *-109 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
5.65* 1036 |
1.84* 1036 |
3.40* 1035 |
|
Total
Resistance
(J) |
7.83
* 1036 |
|
The relative fast rotation of the
star reveals that a planet recently
have been lost.
Planets-b is the next to be
sacrificed.
|
|
Formalhaut |
|
Mass : Sun |
2.1 |
Mass : Kg |
4,2
* 1030 |
|
Radius m |
1.832 |
Distance LY |
25.0 |
|
Circumference |
8053472000 |
Rotation |
1 days |
|
Surface Velocity |
93622
m/s |
Rotation km/s |
93 km/s |
|
Average
Rotation Velocity |
51492
m/s |
Rotation s. |
86021 |
|
Resistance
|
1.47 * 10-8 |
Age |
|
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
5.55
*
1039 |
|
|
Planet: |
b |
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
320000 |
|
Second (1 orbit) |
2.7648 * 1010 |
|
Radius (average) ..(m) |
1,.76 * 1013 |
|
Orbit
circumference..(m) |
1.10 * 1014 |
|
Angel Velocity..(m/s) |
1319444444 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
953.49 |
|
Velocity |
3.989 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
8.84 *
10-11 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
4.52 * 1034 |
|
Formalhaut
rotates 1 time per day. This
star has the double mass
compared to our Sun. This
demonstrates really perfectly
the strengths of the space wind,
and how important the
accelerating space wind
is to understand.
In the past we didn't expect
that planets could be "created"
so fare away from the star, as
shown here,- today some
scientist have accepted this,
even though its sounds
unacceptable.
Now we have very good reasons to
know
what is going on, -it’s just to
accept the force of
space wind and try to understand
it mathematical .
We even should expect to find
more planets even further away
than Formalhaut-b (in the same
solar system). |
|
HR 8799 |
|
Mass : Sun |
1,47 |
Mass : Kg |
2.94 * 1030 |
|
Radius m |
1.34 |
Distance LY |
129 |
|
Circumference |
5890640000 |
Rotation days |
1.8 days |
|
Surface Velocity |
37877 m |
Rotation km/s |
37.5 km/s. |
|
Average
Rotation Velocity |
20832 m |
Rotation s. |
155520 s. |
|
Resistance
|
2.41 * 10-9 |
Age |
0.06 Gyr |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
6.37
*
1038 |
|
|
|
Planets |
HR 8799
b |
HR 8799
c |
HR 8799
d |
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
170000 |
69000 |
36500 |
|
Second (1 orbit)..(m) |
1.4688 * 1010 |
5.9616 * 109 |
3.1536 * 109 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
1.03 * 1013 |
5.61 * 1012 |
3.67 * 1012 |
|
Orbit
circumference |
6.47 * 1013 |
3.52 * 1013 |
2.30 * 1013 |
|
Angel Velocity..(m/s) |
416023662 |
226337448 |
147890946 |
|
Mass (* Mass of Earth) |
2224.81 |
3178.3 |
3178.3 |
|
Velocity |
4.363 |
5.912 |
7.309 |
|
Space Wind |
1.77 * 10-9
m/s2 |
3,24 * 10-9 m/s2 |
4,95 * 10-9 m/s2 |
|
Orbit
Resistance
(m/s)
|
1.05 * 10-10 |
1.94 * 10-10 |
2.96 * 10-10 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
1.25 * 1035 |
3.31 *
1035 |
5.05 *
1035 |
|
Total
Resistance
(J) |
9.61 * 1035 |
|
HR 8799
shows the same pattern as
Formalhaut.
Planets are thrown out in space, due
to
space wind
from a fast rotating star.
|
|
|
 |
|
Our
Solar System have Recently Lost a Huge Planet |
|
|
|

|
Our
Solar System |
|
 |
|
The
rotation of our Sun hasn't always
been so stable. Our sun has most
likely also had huge planets in
orbit, so like we see many others
solar system have. Huge planets does
relative fast cause a star to lose
rotation speed, because it is the
star that transfer KE (SpaceWind) to
planets so that these can overcome
the resistance against motion (RR)
Imaging that our sun for million or
billion years ago also at least had
one huge planet in orbit. Lets call
it Titanic.
Titanic, the nearest planet to the
Sun was dragged towards the Suns due
to the tidal force and
RR,
Titanic was the main cause to that
the Sun lose much of its rotation
speed, thereby Titanic was digging
its own grave.
This could really very well had
happen, and it seems that it had,
because why should our Sun in the
past not also had had huge planet's
in orbit. (?)
Even though Titanic didn't surveyed,
some of its moons certainly most
have done so. Several of these moons
weren’t trapped by the strong
tidal effect,
they were to small and were instead
forced into larger and larger
elliptical strange orbits.
Many moons must have smash into
Titanic but some must have surveyed.
Titanic demise caused the suns
rotation to increase again; hence
some moons could escape far out in
space due to the support from the
increasing stronger
space wind.
But Titanic was doomed due to the
strong
tidal force.
Titanic's outer rubble was the first
objects to escape from the planet.
This is today known as the asteroid
belts. The next object that escaped
was the moon: Mars, - and next was
the moon: Earth, then the moon:
Venus, and last the moon; Mercury.
So we actually very well could live
on a old moon, once orbiting
Titanic.
This must had happen to Titanic's
moon, simply because of when
approaching the Sun, the orbit
of Titanic's moon must have been
dragged larger and larger by the
gravity of the Sun, until
these moons have been escape the
gravity of Titanic, and begun to
orbit the Sun instead.
If the planet Titanic ever existed,
yes we certainly live on one of its
surveyed moon. No doubt about it.
|
|
|
This part of the theory can solve
several mysteries. |
|
|
 |
The moons of Titanic's (e.g.
Earth) could have brought
the water here. |
|
 |
Rotation of our Sun once was
slower, - this was dragging
all planet inwards.
When Titanic was lost it was
speeding up the Suns
rotation, - this was though
planet further out again.
The Suns different rotation
speed explains that Jupiter's atmosphere
must have come from a much
cooler place
her. |
| |
| |
|
 |
We have found gas-planet's
too close to stars. These
shouldn't could exist so
close to stars because
when the stars were ignited
the gas-atmosphere should
"should" had blow away. This
theory shows that that
planets have approaching the
Sun
after the star was
ignited..
|
| |
| |
|
 |
We have found planets more
than 15 billion kilometre away from
the mother star. These can according
to our models not have been created
so fare away from the stars. - These have not been created at this
distance, - but the
spacewind
have brought them so fare
away. |
|
|
|
|
 |
We don’t know why most of
the matter is moving towards
the centre of a
proto-planetary disc.
Which force drives the
matter inwards?
The answer is; simply
because of the rotation of
the system of a proto
planetary disc in the
beginning was too slow and
hence the
resistance against motion
(RR)
relative stronger. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Titanic had once brought
Mercury dangerous close to the Sun.
At that time the size of Mercury was
much larger than now. Mercury was
really struggling very hard for its
life. The suns gravity ribbed away
the surface of Mercury. This explain
why the density of Mercury is 35 %
larger than the density of Mars.
Hence the inner core of Mercury is
relative bigger than the inner core
of Mars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Data are extracted from
http://exoplanet.eu and
from
http://en.wikipedia.org
Extracted data from
all
the stars that rotate and
also have planets in orbit is
collected
here
|
|
|
|
|