|
13.
Solar systems
This page is not edited to perfect
English (coming soon). |
| |
|
Basics |
 |
Before reading this
chapter please read these two pages
here and
here.
|
 |
A star must rotate to keep
the planets in orbits. |
|
 |
Stars and planet rotation
will gradually stop, because
the rotation of astronomic
bodies "pays" all the lost
of KE due to
resistance against motion
(RAM) both
according to orbit and
rotation velocity. |
|
11p |
|
 |
If the rotation energy
(space wind), of a planet (from a star) and
the resistance against
motion (that affects the
planets) both has the same
strengths, the orbits of the
planet's are stable. |
|
|
|
 |
When huge planet's
approaching their mother
stars due to the
tidal
force,
and due to
RAM the star
increases it's rotation
velocity. And this
will force other planets
(further out) of
the solar system further
away from the star.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
After planets are
thrown further away from the
star, the star will lose
KE and will again
slow down it's rotation. Once
again a huge (or small) planet can be
dragged towards the star due
to the
tidal force and
RAM
and
the
process will repeat it
self. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Solar
Systems |
 |
|
|
Our Solar
System |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1 |
Mass : Kg |
2 * 1030 |
|
Circumference |
4396000000 |
Age |
4.5 Gyr |
|
Surface Velocity |
1483 m/s |
Distance
LY |
0 |
|
Average
Rotation Velocity |
815
m/s |
Rotation days |
34.3 |
|
Resistance
|
3.69
* 10-12 |
Radius m 1R |
1 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
6.64
*
1035 |
Rotation s. |
2963520 |
|
Planets |
|
Planet |
Velocity |
Mass |
Kinetic
resistance |
* mc2 (J) |
|
Mercury |
47.890 |
0,33 * 1024 |
1.27 * 10-8
m/s2 |
3.77 * 1032 |
|
Venus |
35.030
|
4,87 * 1024 |
6.81 * 10-9
m/s2 |
2.98 * 1033 |
|
Earth |
29.790 |
5.97 * 1024 |
4.93 * 10-9
m/s2 |
2.65* 1033 |
|
Mars |
24.130
|
0.642 * 1024 |
3.24 * 10-9
m/s2 |
1.87 * 1032 |
|
Jupiter |
13.060
|
1900 * 1024 |
9.48 * 10-10
m/s2 |
1.62 * 1035 |
|
Saturn |
9.640
|
569
* 1024 |
5.16 * 10-10
m/s2 |
2.64 * 1034 |
|
Uranus |
6.810 |
86,8 * 1024 |
2.68 * 10-10
m/s2 |
2.09 * 1033 |
|
Neptune |
5.430 |
102 * 1024 |
1.63 * 10-10
m/s2 |
1,5 * 1033 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
4.78
* 1035 |
|
|
HD
164922 |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
0.94
|
Mass : Kg |
1.88 * 1030 |
|
Circumference |
3956400000 m. |
Age |
13.4 Gyr |
|
Surface Velocity |
780 m/s |
Distance
LY |
|
|
Average
Rotation Velocity |
429 m/s |
Rotation days |
58.7 days |
|
Resistance
|
1.02 * 10-12 m/s |
Radius m 1R |
0.90 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
1.72 * 1035 |
Rotation s. |
5071680 |
|
Planets |
b |
|
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
1155 |
|
Second (1
orbit)..(m) |
99792000 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
3.16
* 1011 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
114.4188 |
|
Velocity |
19.920 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
2.20 * 10-9 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
1.35
*
1035
|
|
Planet-b is probably the last
planet left in this solar
system
HD 16922, all other are already
lost. |
|
|
HD
74156 |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1.24 (E30) |
Mass : Kg |
2,48
* 1030 |
|
Radius m 1R |
1.58 |
Age |
7.38
Gyr |
|
Circumference |
6945680000 m |
Distance
LY |
210.6 |
|
Surface
Velocity |
4026
m/s |
Rotation days |
19,95 days |
|
Average Rotation Velocity
|
2214
m/s |
Rotation km/s |
4.02 km/s
|
|
Resistance
|
2.73 * 10-11 m/s |
Rotation s. |
1723680 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
6.07 *
1036 |
|
|
|
Planets |
b |
c |
d |
|
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
51.65 |
2476 |
336.6 |
|
Second (1
orbit)..(m) |
4462560 |
213926400 |
29082240 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
4.37
* 1010 |
5.76
* 1011 |
1.53
* 1011 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
597.5204 |
2552.1749 |
125.86068 |
|
Velocity |
56.345 |
15.519 |
30.112 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
1.76
*-108 |
1.34
*-109 |
5.03
*-109 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
5.65* 1036 |
1.84* 1036 |
3.40* 1035 |
|
Total
Resistance
(J) |
7.83 * 1036 |
|
The relative fast rotation of the
star reveals that a planet recently
have been lost.
Planets-b is the next to be
sacrificed.
|
|
HD
11506 |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1.19
|
Mass : Kg |
2,38 * 1030 |
|
Radius m 1R |
1.38 |
Age |
5.4 (± 1.6) Gyr |
|
Circumference
(m) |
6066480000 |
Distance
LY |
176.0 |
|
Surface
Velocity (m) |
2670
m/s |
Rotation days |
26.3 days |
|
Average Rotation Velocity (m) |
1468
m/s |
Rotation km/s |
|
|
Resistance
|
1.20 * 10-11 m/s |
Rotation s. |
2272320 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
2.57 *
1036 |
|
|
|
Planets |
b |
c |
|
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
1270 |
170.46 |
|
Second (1
orbit)..(m) |
109728000 |
14727744 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
3.65
* 1011 |
9.56* 1010 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
1093.3352 |
260.6206 |
|
Velocity |
20.854 |
40.750 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
2.41 *10-9 |
9.23 *
10-9 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
1.42 * 1036 |
1.29 * 1036 |
|
Total
Resistance
(J) |
2.61 * 1036 |
|
The solar system
HD 11506
is similar
to HD
74156. Several planets have
certainly already been lost.
|
|
Mu Arae (HD
160691) |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1.10 |
Mass : (Kg) |
2.2 * 1030 |
|
Radius m 1R |
1.36 |
Age
(Gyr ) |
6.34 |
|
Circumference |
5978560000 |
Rotation days |
31 days |
|
Surface
Velocity |
2232
m/s |
Distance
LY |
50.6 |
|
Average Rotation Velocity (m) |
1227
m/s |
Rotation km/s |
|
|
Resistance
|
8,37 * 10-12
|
Rotation s. |
2678400 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
1.66 *
1036 |
|
|
|
Planets |
b |
c |
d |
f |
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
643.25 |
9.6386 |
310.55 |
4205.8 |
|
Second (1
orbit)..(m) |
55576800 |
832619.52 |
26831520 |
363381120 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
2.25
* 1011 |
1.37
* 1010 |
1.39
* 1011 |
7.89
* 1011 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
532.68308 |
10.5551343 |
165.875477 |
576.54362 |
|
Velocity |
25.538 |
103.493 |
32.491 |
13.637 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
3,63 *10-9 |
5.96 *
10-8 |
5.87
*10-9 |
1,03
*10-9 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
1.03 * 1036 |
3.38 * 1035 |
5.23 * 1035 |
3.19 * 1035 |
|
Total
Resistance
(J) |
2.21 * 1036 |
|
The solar system
HD 160691
is also
similar to
HD 74156
and HD 74156.
All planet of that solar
system is probably very slowly mowing
towards the star; due to the tidal
force and RAM.
The solar system has certainly lost
several planets in the past.
|
|
HD 102272 |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1.9 |
Mass : Kg |
3,8 * 1030 |
|
Radius m 1R |
10.1 |
Distance LY |
|
|
Circumference |
44399600000 |
Rotation days |
170 days |
|
Surface Velocity |
3022
m/s |
Rotation km/s |
|
|
Average
Rotation Velocity |
1667
m/s |
Rotation s. |
14688000 |
|
Resistance
|
1.54 * 10-11
|
Age
(Gyr ) |
0.70 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
5.27 *
1036 |
|
|
|
Planets |
b |
c |
|
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
127.58 |
520 |
|
Second (1 orbit)..(m) |
11022912 |
44928000 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
9.20
* 1010 |
2.35
* 1011 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
1875.197 |
826.358 |
|
Velocity |
52.488 |
32.841 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
1.0 *10-8 |
5.99 * 10-9 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
1 * 1037 |
2.66 * 1036 |
|
Total
Resistance
(J) |
1.27
* 1037 |
|
HD 102272
is rotating 1 time per 170 days.
This is off course apparently not
much compared to our Sun. We
therefore should expect that the
planets fast would approach that
star and in fact already were
demised. But notice that this stars
has a diameter 10 times that of our
Sun's. Hence matter also
moves 10 times faster compared to
our sun.
So even though the rotation is 5
times slower compared to our sun,
the real (average) mass rotation of
HD 102272 is really double so fast
than the mass rotation from our
sun. And so is the space wind.
Hence the statement mention below
really doesn't sounds strange.
In the article
here
we can red, quote:
When red-giant stars expand, they
tend to eat up the nearby planets,
said Wolszczan.
Although the planet we discovered
conceivably could be closer to the
star without being harmed by it,
there appears to be a zone of
avoidance around such stars of about
0.6 astronomical units, which is a
little more than half of the
distance from the Earth to the Sun,
he added.
|
|
WASP-18 |
|
Star |
|
Mass : Sun |
1.25 |
Mass : Kg |
2.5 * 1030 |
|
Radius m 1R |
1.216 |
Distance LY |
|
|
Circumference |
4930553000 |
Rotation days |
5.6 days |
|
Surface Velocity |
11048
m/s |
Rotation km/s |
|
|
Average
Rotation Velocity |
6076
m/s |
Rotation s. |
483840 |
|
Resistance
|
2.05 * 10-10
|
Age |
0.63 Gyr |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
4.63
*
1037 |
|
|
|
Planets |
b |
 |
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
0.94145299 |
|
Second (1 orbit)..(m) |
81216 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
3,03 * 109 |
|
Mass - 10.3 *
(1.9
*
1027) |
1.95
* 1028 |
|
Velocity |
234591 m/s |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
3.06 *10-7 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
5.37 * 1038 |
|
In the system
WASP-18
a planet is struggling for
surveying. The cause of that WASP-18b not
has demised long ago, is that
this planet probably have been
thrown fare out in the solar
system and back gain. This could
had happen several times.
Each time a heavy planets are
lost, all other planet is
thrown further out in space due
to the increasing star rotation. .
When a solar system is born,
several huge planets are
demising. This speeds up the
stars rotation velocity allowing
many other planets to escape
fare out in orbit further away. The next two
solar systems show how this is
possible and how it is possible
for planets again to return to
the star. |
|
Formalhaut |
|
Mass : Sun |
2.1 |
Mass : Kg |
4,2
* 1030 |
|
Radius m |
1.832 |
Distance
LY |
25.0 |
|
Circumference |
8053472000 |
Rotation |
1 days |
|
Surface Velocity |
93622
m/s |
Rotation
km/s |
93 km/s |
|
Average
Rotation Velocity |
51492
m/s |
Rotation s. |
86021 |
|
Resistance
|
1.47 * 10-8 |
Age |
|
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
5.55 *
1039 |
|
|
Planet: |
b |
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
320000 |
|
Second (1
orbit) |
2.7648
* 1010 |
|
Radius (average)
..(m) |
1,.76
* 1013 |
|
Orbit
circumference..(m) |
1.10
* 1014 |
|
Angel
Velocity..(m/s) |
1319444444 |
|
Mass (* M of Earth) |
953.49 |
|
Velocity |
3.989 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
8.84
* 10-11 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
4.52 * 1034 |
|
Formalhaut
rotates 1 time per day. This
star has the double mass
compared to our Sun. This
demonstrates really perfectly
the strengths of the space wind,
and how important the
accelerating space wind
is to understand.
In the past we didn't expect
that planets could be "created"
so fare away from the star, as
shown here,- today some
scientist have
accepted this, even though its
sounds
unacceptable.
Now we have very good reasons to
know
what is going on, -it’s just to
accept the force of
space wind and try to understand
it mathematical .
We even should expect to find
more planets even further away
than Formalhaut-b (in the same
solar system). |
|
HR 8799 |
|
Mass : Sun |
1,47 |
Mass : Kg |
2.94 * 1030 |
|
Radius m |
1.34 |
Distance
LY |
129 |
|
Circumference |
5890640000 |
Rotation days |
1.8 days |
|
Surface Velocity |
37877
m |
Rotation
km/s |
37.5 km/s. |
|
Average
Rotation Velocity |
20832
m |
Rotation s. |
155520 s. |
|
Resistance
|
2.41
* 10-9 |
Age |
0.06 Gyr |
|
Resistance
* mc2 (J) |
6.37 *
1038 |
|
|
|
Planets |
HR 8799 b |
HR 8799
c |
HR 8799
d |
|
Days (1 orbit) ..(days) |
170000 |
69000 |
36500 |
|
Second (1
orbit)..(m) |
1.4688
* 1010 |
5.9616 * 109 |
3.1536 * 109 |
|
Radius (average)..(m) |
1.03
* 1013 |
5.61 * 1012 |
3.67 * 1012 |
|
Orbit
circumference |
6.47
* 1013 |
3.52
* 1013 |
2.30
* 1013 |
|
Angel
Velocity..(m/s) |
416023662 |
226337448 |
147890946 |
|
Mass (* Mass of Earth) |
2224.81 |
3178.3 |
3178.3 |
|
Velocity |
4.363 |
5.912 |
7.309 |
|
Space Wind |
1.77 * 10-9
m/s2 |
3,24 * 10-9 m/s2 |
4,95 * 10-9 m/s2 |
|
Orbit Resistance
(m/s)
|
1.05 * 10-10 |
1.94 * 10-10 |
2.96 * 10-10 |
|
Resistance
* mc2 |
1.25 * 1035 |
3.31 *
1035 |
5.05 *
1035 |
|
Total
Resistance
(J) |
9.61 * 1035 |
|
HR 8799
shows the same pattern as
Formalhaut.
Planets are thrown out in space, due
to
space wind
from a fast rotating star.
|
|
Our
Solar System |
|
 |
|
The
rotation of our Sun hasn't
always been so stable. Our sun has
most likely also had huge planets in
orbit, so like we see many others
solar system have. Huge planets
does relative fast cause a star to
lose rotation speed, because it is
the star that transfer KE
(SpaceWind) to planets so that
these can overcome the resistance
against motion (RAM)
Imaging that our sun for million or
billion years ago also at least had
one huge planet in orbit. Lets call
it Titanic.
Titanic, the nearest planet to the
Sun was dragged towards the Suns due
to the tidal force and
RAM,
Titanic was the main cause to that
the Sun lose much of its rotation
speed, thereby Titanic was digging
its own grave.
This could really very well had
happen, and it seems that it had,
because why should our Sun in the
past not also had had huge planet's
in orbit. (?)
Even though Titanic didn't surveyed,
some of its moons certainly most
have done so. Several of these moons
weren’t trapped by the strong
tidal effect,
they were to small and were instead forced into larger and
larger elliptical strange orbits. Many moons must have
smash into Titanic but some must
have surveyed.
Titanic demise caused the suns rotation to
increase again; hence some moons
could escape far out in space due to the
support from the increasing stronger
space wind.
But Titanic was doomed due to the
strong
tidal force.
Titanic's outer rubble was the first
objects to escape from the planet.
This is today known as the asteroid
belts. The next object that escaped
was the moon: Mars, - and next was
the moon: Earth, then the moon:
Venus, and last the moon; Mercury.
So we actually very well could live
on a old moon, once orbiting
Titanic.
This must had happen to Titanic's
moon, simply because of when
approaching the Sun, the orbit
of Titanic's moon must have been
dragged larger and larger by the
gravity of the Sun, until
these moons have been escape the
gravity of Titanic, and begun to
orbit the Sun instead.
If the planet Titanic ever existed,
yes we certainly live on one of its
surveyed moon. No doubt about it.
This part of the theory can solve
several mysteries.
|
 |
The moons of Titanic's
(e.g. Earth) could have brought the
water here. |
|
 |
We know Jupiter's atmosphere
must have come from a much
cooler place
her.
Titanic (and maybe other
planet that now all had demised)
could certainly have dragged
Jupiter (and other outer
planets) much closer to the
Sun. Simply because
when huge planets is lost
the Sun's rotation will
first decrease, and this bring
planets closer to the Sun. |
| |
| |
|
 |
We have found gas-planet's
too close
to stars. These shouldn't
could exist so close to
stars because when the stars
were ignited
the gas-atmosphere should
"should" had blow away. This
theory shows that that
planets
have approaching the Sun
after the star was
ignited..
|
| |
| |
|
 |
We have found planets more
than 15 billion kilometre
away from the mother star.
These can according to our
models not have been created
so fare away from the stars.
- And they have not been
created at this distance, - because
the
spacewind
have brought
them so fare away. |
|
|
|
|
 |
We don’t know why most of
the matter is moving towards
the centre of a
proto-planetary disc. Which
force drives the matter
inwards?
The answer is; simply
because of the rotation of
the system of a proto
planetary disc in the
beginning was too slow and
hence the
resistance against motion
(RAM)
relative stronger. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Titanic had once brought Mercury
dangerous close
to the Sun. At that time the
size of Mercury was much
larger than now. Mercury was
really struggling very hard
for its life. The suns
gravity ribbed away the
surface of Mercury.
This explain why the density
of Mercury is
35 % larger than the density
of Mars.
Hence the inner core of Mercury
is relative bigger than the inner
core of Mars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To
fully understand this parts, it's recommended to read all the
links below, in the order these are represented. |
|
|
1 |
How
to calculate the equalizing
forces
here |
|
|
2 |
How much the space wind affects
satellites
here
|
|
|
3 |
How much the space wind affects
space probes
here |
|
|
4 |
How much the space wind
affects
moons
here |
 |
5 |
How much the space wind affects
other solar
systems.
here
|
|
|
6 |
How much the space wind affects
Mercury's Orbit Anomaly.
here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data are extracted from
http://exoplanet.eu and
from
http://en.wikipedia.org
Extracted data from
all
the stars that rotate and
also have planets in orbit is
collected
here
None exclusion have been done.
|
|
|
|
www.science27.com
|
|