|
Watch a 3 minutes introduction video
HERE.
So far, our understanding of gravity has
been quite incoherent. This may have led to
some false conclusions about our natural
universe and some properties of gravity
these conclusions may imply.
The theory which follows in this text stems
from the idea that the notion of space
curvature is better understood as space
contraction, both nearby and within the
matter that causes it. This paradigm shift
does not give rise to scientific conflict
but rather leads us to several remarkable
consequences. The most significant of which
will follow |
|
This theory derives mathematical support
from the formula of acceleration due to
gravity.
What makes this formula very interesting is
the proportionality between the ‘amount’ of
space and the ‘strength’ of gravity.
Each time the radius of a circle doubles,
the area quadruples. Since, in this case,
the circles share a common centre, the space
the larger circle occupies, that the smaller
circle does not, accounts for 75% of the
larger circle’s area.
At the same time the force of acceleration
due to gravity always decreased 75%.
This result is not a coincidence, but rather
expresses a previously unknown relation
between space and gravity. |
 |
|
This relation seems to convincingly support
the claim that matter contracts space. When
space itself contracts, the contraction
spreads in a domino-like effect across the
whole universe and bends space towards that
object.
This seems to be exactly the proportionality
that the formula of acceleration due to
gravity shows. In that sense even a grain of
sand can cause bending/contraction of the
whole universe.
This is not merely a matter of diction or
semantics, but rather a new found
understanding of gravitation. We can now
understand what bended space really is..
|
 |
 |
|
One benefit our new found
understanding is that it leads
us to a clearer understanding of
the
cause of gravity. When
matter contracts space, the
space between objects becomes
increasingly contracted. Can it
really be that simple.
|
|
|
When 2 objects approach each other
the acceleration due to gravity
between the two objects decreases
while the contraction of space in
that region increases.
Decreased acceleration,
do not mean decreased force of
gravity, - but only that two
gravitational fields
are into a unification process and
that two connected gravity
properties are changing.
|
 |
|
The cause of acceleration due to
gravity is simply the relative
change in contraction of space per
unit distance. The above mentioned
point of view is new, but not that
strange or different from the
prevailing understanding..
Unfortunately, known facts
according to how gravity
between 2 objects behaves,
seems to have 'blinded' us,
so much so that we have
thought we already fully had
understood gravity, and
therefore have failed to
consider any other
theoretical frameworks.
|
|
This new framework proposes
that when matter
surrounds space, we are
faced with an entirely
different phenomenon.
Matter will contract space
in the direction away from
its center as well as
towards its center
The above mentioned domino effect will take affect in both
of these directions.
However, towards the inner
direction the square of the
radius will decrease
therefore the resultant
acceleration will gradually
increase. This is, at least,
what the acceleration due to
gravity formula tries to
tell us. So far our naive
vantage point has not
allowed us to interpret the
formula correctly.
This new interpretation
implies both; the extent of
space contraction and
acceleration due to gravity
gradually as we approach the
center of a gravitational
field.
|
 |
|
This means the result is both gradually
increasing contracted space
as well as increasing
acceleration due to gravity, as
we approach a inner
gravitational field center..
This simple claim could very well shed new light on the
understanding of the cause
of black wholes, dark
matter, the pioneer
anomalies and even the cause
of gravity. It could solve
all the mysteries of how
galaxies and stars were
created, at a time when
gravity (according to the
prevailing theory) ‘should’
have been almost zero.
But it also means that as one approaches the center of the
earth, acceleration due to
gravity will increase
surprisingly deep inside the
earth, and not
cancel out component wise as
the prevailing theory
states.
|
|
|
|
