|
What has changed is so far only an expression, it's not
necessary to change or violate anything else. Einstein's
theory of space-time will remain intact.
All that by way of introduction is assumed is that
curved space is in reality contracted space,
the opposite of expanded space.
Assuming this will give us an interesting main tread. This
article will try to follow this main tread to see where it
brings us.
Even if the expression: "Matter Contract Space" seems
to be close to the well-known: "Curvature of Space",
this article will show that such simple changes are merely
in expression. In reality this theory opens, not some, but
all the doors to fully understanding the cause of gravity
and more.
Well, this “immediately” sounds too good to be true. But think
about attempting to solve one mystery. Most likely some of
your findings will contradict other information. Matter
contract space seems to solve 10 to 12 huge mysteries, and
is met with little by way of contradiction or opposition.
Even further,
"Matter
contract space"
leads us to a more
complete understanding of existing theories.
This assumption
will quickly lead to the conclusion that
our
understanding of central gravity has been based in part
on a serious
misunderstanding;
For the last
300 years we have accepted
that our knowledge about how
two or several fields
of gravity
affect (and counteract)
each other was correct (and it is) and that this
expression of
a law of gravity should be used to
understand how one single field of gravity
centrally counteracts itself, (but this is wrong).
*
* *
When we draw
a comparison between Einstein’s and Newton’s claim; there need not be any
disagreement between the discoveries of these two great thinkers. The claim of
Isaac Newton that ‘there is a force of attraction between bodies’ could
just as well be the force which is responsible for the curving of space.
The curvature
of space leads us to think that there may be some link between matter and
space. Put quite simply this is because space curves are proportional to the
amount of matter in a gravitational field. Even though we cannot see space it
must somehow be linked or connected to matter.
We also know
that space (and energy) somehow created matter.
Either space
and matter were divided after the creation of matter or; there always has
been a connection between space and matter, and space and matter have a
continuous, exchangeable co-existence with each other.
The main tread
of this article is; does 'space contracts' have the exactly same meaning as
'space curves'. In looking into this it leads us to ask questions about
gravity. The currently accepted understanding of what space is, is suitable
purely for mathematical/geometric purposes. The new expression is more suitable
for our mind.
A large part of
this theory doesn't need to be proven as it follows from the work of Albert
Einstein and Sir Isaac Newton.
It is essential
we understand that ‘space curves’, ‘space deforms’, and ‘space time’ are all
expressions of the same phenomena. Nothing should stop us from adding ‘space
contracts’.
Understanding
space in a contraction framework sets us to better understand what happens to
space in the presence of matter.
The question of
how matter causes space to curve, deform, or contract will remain the same.
The chapter
'quantum physics' will give a good suggestion as to how this might be possible.
There it will be shown that a force driven by the spin of elementary particles
can be suspected for spinning space together until it contracts and curves.
So far this
sound pretty peaceful, but it also seems quit possible that Isaac Newton made a
big mistake a long time ago that neither Einstein, nor anybody discovered. This mistake that has prevented us from better understanding central gravity. In the next chapter "Dark Matter" we will uncover what
went wrong 300 years ago.
One of the most important consequences is that space
will move as matter moves.
Following this track can
(as already mentioned) bring new light to the cause
of dark matter, the pioneer
anomaly as well as the
underlying cause of
magnetism.
| 
