|
Speed:
Andromeda's approaching the Milkyway with
a speed estimated to between 140 and 300 km/s
(up to 1% of the speed of light)
Distance:
Between the Milkyway and Andromeda is
estimated to about 2,1 to 2,9 MLY (Million Light-years)
|
1
LY |
9,461 x
1015 Meter. |
|
1
MLY |
9,461 x
1021 Meter |
|
2,3
MLY |
2,176
x 1022Meter |
Mass of the
Milky-way
100 billion
suns = 100 x 1x109 x 1x1030 = 1x1041
Kg.
Blueshift
'z' = minus
0,001 (or 0,1%)
If Andromeda is
approaching with 300 km/s it will take 2,3 Billion Years to
reach us. (1/1000
of the speed of light.)
After 2,3
Million years 'z' will be z= minus 1
The unification process
of Andromeda and the Milkyway have been going on for some billion
years
already
.
All together
'z' can therefore
(after 2,3
billion years) very roughly be estimated to
approximated
z =
minus 3
When the
unification process of the two equal galaxies totally result
in z=
-3 this shows how much the
the mass and thereby 'z' have increases. But before the
unification process started the space in each of the galaxies was
already contracted. The question is how much?
Lets assume
that Andromeda
and the Milkyway have about the same amount of mass.
When
unification of two equal masses results in z = - 3 it
shows that since the mass increased to the
double size it results that 'z' also in reality must
have increased to
the double of this size it was before the unification
process begun. This mean that z also was must have
been (z- 3) before the unification had begun.
After the unification process is completed 'z' will
therefore in reality have reach the double size (z = - 6).
By measuring
how much 'z' increases in the unification process of
two (equal) galaxies therefore should make it possible to
get a roughly impression of how much 'z' was
before the unification process started.
But what we are
measuring (blue-shift) is how much space contracts
between two galaxies.
Anyway lets
assume that
z = minus
6
in the periphery of the new 'super'
- galaxy after the unification process of the Milkyway and
Andromeda is completed. .
This should
give us a impression that 'z' in the periphery
of the Milkyway very roughly is about (z = minus 3).
In other words
space in the periphery of the Milkyway is contracted 3
times.
On this basis
we have some kind of parameter to find out how
much space is contracted elsewhere. This can be done by
comparing Gravity Acceleration
with 'z'
|
Gravity Acceleration Compared to 'z'
at
the Milky-ways periphery |
|
Gravity Constant |
|
Mass / R2
|
|
Gravity Acceleration
|
Contraction of Space
|
|
G=6,67 x
10-11 |
X |
1x1041 |
=
|
7,4
x
10-12
m / s |
z =
3 |
|
9,461 x 1020 x 9,461
x 1020 |
|
Gravity Acceleration Compared to 'z'
25.000 LY from centre of the Milky-way |
|
Gravity Constant |
|
Mass / R2
|
|
Gravity Acceleration
|
Contraction of Space
|
|
G=6,67 x
10-11 |
X |
1x1041 |
=
|
1,2
x
10-10
m / s |
z =
48 |
|
2,365 x 1020 x 2,365
x 1020 |
|
The gravity acceleration is here 16 times
greater, than in the periphery of the Milky-way
Whereby
also the the contraction of space will be so.
This mean z = (3x16) = 48 |
|
Gravity Acceleration Compared to 'z'
in
the centre of the Milky-way (Black hole) |
|
Gravity Constant |
|
Mass / R2
|
|
Gravity Acceleration
|
Contraction of Space
|
|
G=6,67 x
10-11 |
X |
1x1041 |
= |
6,67
x
1030
m / s |
z =
2,7x1042 |
|
0
x 0 |
|
The gravity acceleration is here
9x1041
times greater, than in the periphery of the MW
Whereby
also the the contraction of space will be so.
This mean z = (3 x
9x 1041)
=
2,7 x 1042
|
|
Gravity Acceleration Compared to 'z'
At
the surface of Earths |
|
Gravity Constant |
|
Mass / R2
|
|
Gravity Acceleration
|
Contraction of Space
|
|
G=6,67 x
10-11 |
X |
6x1024 |
= |
9,8
m / s |
z =
3,9x1012 |
|
6,378 x 106 x 6,378
x 106 |
|
The gravity acceleration is here
1,3x1012
times greater, than in the periphery of the MW
Whereby
also the the contraction of space will be so.
This mean z = (3x 1,3x1012
) =
3,9x 1012
|
|
Gravity Acceleration Compared to 'z'
At
the centre of Earths |
|
Gravity Constant |
|
Mass / R2
|
|
Gravity Acceleration
|
Contraction of Space
|
|
G=6,67 x
10-11 |
X |
6x1024 |
= |
4 x
1014
m / s |
z = 1,6x1026 |
|
0
x 0 |
|
The gravity acceleration is here
5,4x1025
times greater, than in the periphery of the MW
Whereby
also the the contraction of space will be so.
This mean z = (3x
5,4x1025
) =
1,6 x 1026
|
|
Gravity Acceleration Compared to 'z'
At
10 kilometre from the eye of a hurricane
Mass = 1.000.000M x 1.000.000M x 0.1M |
|
Gravity Constant |
|
Mass / R2
|
|
Gravity Acceleration
|
Contraction of Space
|
|
G=6,67 x
10-11 |
X |
1x1011 |
= |
1 x
10-9
m / s |
z =
27039 |
|
10000 x 10000 |
|
The gravity acceleration at radius 10 Km is here
9013
times greater, than in the periphery of the MW
Whereby
also the the contraction of space will be so.
This mean z = (3x
9013
) =
27039 |
|
|
|
Gravity Acceleration Compared to 'z'
At
the surface
of the Sun |
|
Gravity Constant |
|
Mass / R2
|
|
Gravity Acceleration
|
Contraction of Space
|
|
G=6,67 x
10-11 |
X |
2x1030 |
= |
276 m
/ s |
z =
1,1
x 1014 |
|
6,968
x
6,968
|
|
The gravity acceleration is here
3,7x1013
times greater, than in the periphery of the MW
Whereby
also the the contraction of space will be so.
This mean z (3x3,7x1013
) = 1,1
x 1014 |
|
Light will on the sun only 'bend' - with only 1,75 bow second
at the suns surface.
On
a 90 degree scale this is only
1/185142
Space contracts 2 x 1018
times more like the light deflect at the
surface of the sun.
Why
is lights deflection so weak - compared to space
contraction ? |
|
Gravity Acceleration Compared to 'z'
At
the surface
of the Sirius B |
|
Gravity Constant |
|
Mass / R2
|
|
Gravity Acceleration
|
Contraction of Space
|
|
G=6,67 x
10-11 |
X |
2x1030 |
= |
4,2 x
106
m / s |
z =
1,7
x 1018 |
|
5,576
x 5.576
|
|
The gravity acceleration is here
5,7x1017
times greater, than in the periphery of the MW
Whereby
also the the contraction of space will be so.
This mean z (3x5,7x1017
) = 1,7
x 1018 |
|
Light will on the Sirius B will only
'contracts' (Gravety Redshift) with
+Z=0,000266
Space is contracting 6,4 x 1021
times more like the light at Sirius
'contracts'.
Why
is lights 'contraction' so weak - compared to
space contraction ? |
Is it from
different angels possible to show that this (very roughly)
calculation of space contraction is correct.?
For instance
based on quantum physics?.
|