|
This site have expired Read:
http://www.science27.com/english/evidence.html
There are several possible methods to test this
theory. The best and most convincing one is to
measure acceleration due to gravity below and
above the gravitational centre of high buildings and
inside mountains.

When measuring acceleration due to gravity above
the gravitational centre (the red dot) inside the
world’s largest buildings, we will see that mass
above the measurement point does not counteract
acceleration due to gravity. However, it will
surprise us to discover that the (buildings’)
acceleration due to gravity is stable towards the
buildings’ gravitational centre.
Only when measuring acceleration due to gravity
below the gravitational centre will we see that mass
(above the measurement point) counteracts, resulting
in weaker acceleration due to gravity. And again it
will surprise us to discover that acceleration due
to gravity (caused by the building) is gradually
stronger towards the buildings’ gravitational
centre. (Weight must also be measured).
In short: We will discover that central gravity
doesn't cancel out component wise.
It's the opposite that happens. This will reveal an
old and simple sign error, minus that should have
been plus, and hence reveals a much more simple
universe than today. This will prove this theory.
This
will prove this theory.
But there is several other possibilities. read the chapters:
Here are mentioned the most promising ways of proving
this theory.
Secondly, if technically possible, measurements of the
acceleration due to gravity should also be taken directly above the
eye of a hurricane. Here we may find gravity to be
stronger than expected. Also the sunny eye, and the eye-wall around the
eye, of a hurricane could be better understood,
since an extended mass must also pull space and
matter from its inner core, not only from it's
periphery.
Thirdly, it is probably possible to better
understand the cause of low
pressure systems. Gravity must be involved.
Finally, this simple theory claims to easily explain
the cause to several natural mysteries, for
instance: the cause of gravity, dark matter, dark
energy, and much more, based on the same simple
and single claim.
This will, sooner or later, certainly bring us to a
much deeper and conflict-free scientific picture of
the universe, which fits with the latest
measurements and discoveries.
This theory’s main thread has led us to many areas
of science. Some of which we have so far had limited
understanding of and some which we, so far, have had
more extensive knowledge. But this theory resolves
all limitation of knowledge and explains all of
these mysteries. This can not be a coincidence.
Normally, just showing the cause of a single mystery
can cause a lot of conflict and raise more questions
than the theory is answering. This is not the case
with this theory, it solves several mysteries in a
single claim.
Contributions from other people, for instance
mathematical framework etc, will come sooner or
later.
|